BROWN, et al v. AMERICAN HOME PROD, et al
Filing
4342
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 8743 THAT THE MOTION OF LINDA SMITH TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN REPLY TO THE ANSWER OF AHP SETTLEMENT TRUST (DOC. NO. 99-20593; ENTRY NO. 4245) IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET HER REPLY; THE MOTION OF LINDA SMITH FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. NO.99-20593; ENTRY NO.4236) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/27/2011. 12/28/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL.(SEE 11-MD-1203 PAPER NO.109546) (kk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/
FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL NO. 1203
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
SHEILA BROWN, et al.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 99-20593
v.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS
CORPORATION
2:16 MD 1203
PRETRIAL ORDER NO.
AND NOW, on this
d...lit day
of December, 2011, for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1)
the motion of Linda Smith to file a supplemental
brief in reply to the answer of the AHP Settlement Trust (Docket
No. 99-20593; Entry No. 4245) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court
is directed to docket her Reply; and
(2)
the motion of Linda Smith for a protective order
(Docket No. 99-20593; Entry No. 4236) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?