BROWN, et al v. AMERICAN HOME PROD, et al

Filing 4342

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 8743 THAT THE MOTION OF LINDA SMITH TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN REPLY TO THE ANSWER OF AHP SETTLEMENT TRUST (DOC. NO. 99-20593; ENTRY NO. 4245) IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET HER REPLY; THE MOTION OF LINDA SMITH FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. NO.99-20593; ENTRY NO.4236) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/27/2011. 12/28/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL.(SEE 11-MD-1203 PAPER NO.109546) (kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/ FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL NO. 1203 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: SHEILA BROWN, et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 99-20593 v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION 2:16 MD 1203 PRETRIAL ORDER NO. AND NOW, on this d...lit day of December, 2011, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of Linda Smith to file a supplemental brief in reply to the answer of the AHP Settlement Trust (Docket No. 99-20593; Entry No. 4245) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to docket her Reply; and (2) the motion of Linda Smith for a protective order (Docket No. 99-20593; Entry No. 4236) is DENIED. BY THE COURT:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?