BROWN, et al v. AMERICAN HOME PROD, et al

Filing 4356

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 8754 THAT THE MOTION OF CLAIMANT EVA J. BURGESS TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN REPLY TO RESPONSE OF THE AHP SETTLEMENT TRUST IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET CLAIMANT'S REPLY; THE MOTION TO PROCESS CLAI MS FOR CATEGORY TWO BENEFITS IS DENIED; AND THE MOTION TO GRANT PRIOR MOTION AS UNCONTESTED, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR ORAL HEARING ON THE PRIOR MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 1/5/2012; 1/6/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE PAPER #109559 IN 11-MD-1203)(tomg )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/
FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

)
)
)

MDL NO. 1203

------------~----------------))
)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
SHEILA BROWN, et al.

)

v.

)
)
)

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS
CORPORATION

)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 99-20593

2:16 MD 1203

PRETRIAL ORDER NO.

AND NOW, on this

5tl

day of January, 2012, for the

reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1)

the motion of Claimant Eva J. Burgess to file a

supplemental brief in reply to the response of the AHP Settlement
Trust (Docket No. 99-20593; Entry NO. 4077) is GRANTED, and the
Clerk of Court is directed to docket Claimant's Reply;
(2)

the motion of Eva J. Burgess to process claims for

Category Two benefits (Docket No. 99-20593; Entry No. 3695) is
DENIED; and
(3)

the motion of Eva J. Burgess to grant prior motion

as uncontested, or in the alternative, motion for oral hearing on
the prior motion (Docket No. 99-20593; Entry No. 4029) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT: