BROWN, et al v. AMERICAN HOME PROD, et al

Filing 4937

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 9162 THAT THE MOTION OF JANICE E. MADKINS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PTO NO. 7666 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; PTO NO. 9150 IS VACATED; THE REPORT AND AWARD DATED DECEMBER 28, 2012 CONCERNING THE CLAIM OF MS. MADKINS IS VACAT ED; THE OCTOBER 16, 2013 REQUEST OF MS. MADKINS TO CONSIDER "ADDITIONAL ENCLOSED 'PROGRESS NOTES'" IS REFERRED TO THE CHAIR OF THE ARBITRATION PANEL FOR DISPOSITION PURSUANT TO RULE 9.b OF THE RULES GOVERNING ARBITRATION PROCESS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 11/13/2013; 11/13/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 110142 IN 11-MD-1203). (tjd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/
FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL NO. 1203

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
SHEILA BROWN, et al.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 99-20593

v.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS
CORPORATION
PRETRIAL ORDER NO.

AND NOW, this

ljfkday of November, 2013, upon

consideration of the motion of Janice E. Madkins (Doc. No. 4929)
for reconsideration of Pretrial Order ( 11 PT0 11 ) No. 7666, and for
the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is
hereby ORDERED that:
(1)

the motion is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part;

(2)

PTO No. 9150 is VACATED;

(3)

the Report and Award dated December 28, 2012

concerning the claim of Ms. Madkins is VACATED; and
(4)

the October 16, 2013 request of Ms. Madkins to

consider "additional enclosed 'progress notes'" is referred to
the Chair of the Arbitration Panel for disposition pursuant to
Rule 9.b. of the Rules Governing Arbitration Process.
BY THE COURT: