ARMSTRONG v. FEIN
ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS ARE DENIED:PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT DOCKET NO. 29. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO REOPEN CASE DOCKET NO. 30. AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT DOCKET NO. 31. MAILED TO PRO-SE PARTY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 11/25/09. 11/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(dp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG v. BARBARA A. FEIN, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2009, the following motions are denied: CIVIL ACTION
1. "Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment with Supporting Affidavit and Documentation, in Response and in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, if any, (Brief II)" (docket no. 29); 2. "Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion to Reopen Case" (docket no. 30); 3. "Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint" (docket no. 31).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edmund V. Ludwig Edmund V. Ludwig, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?