HANKIN FAMILY PART., et al v. UPPER MERION TOWN., et al

Filing 184

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF TIMONEY'S MOTION TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AND CROSS CLAIMS WILL BE DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/5/12. 1/6/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HANKIN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, et al., :
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
:
UPPER MERION TOWNSHIP, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 01-1622

ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of January 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff Timoney’s
Motion for Leave to Supplement the First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 115); Defendants’
Amended Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff Timoney’s Motion for Leave to File
Supplemental Complaint And Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 118); Realen’s Memorandum in
Opposition re for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint And Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 120);
Plaintiff Timoney’s Reply to Response to Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint And
Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 125); Realen’s Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiff Timoney’s Motion for
Leave to File Supplemental Complaint And Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 128); Defendants’ Surreply
in Opposition to Plaintiff Timoney’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint And
Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 129); Realen’s Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff Timoney’s
Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint And Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 156); Plaintiff
Timoney’s Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Leave to File
Supplemental Complaint And Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 157); Defendants’ Supplemental Brief in
Opposition to Plaintiff Timoney’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint And

1

Cross-Claim (Doc. No. 158); arguments made by counsel at a hearing held on October 7, 2010;
and for reasons set forth in the Opinion of the Court filed this day, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff
Timoney’s Motion (Doc. No. 115) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J.
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

2