ROMERO, et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE, et al

Filing 1221

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION (ECF DOC. NO. 1174) IS GRANTED AS THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT PRECLUDING JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW BARRING THESE DISPARATE TREATMENT CLAIMS AS UNTIMELY & REQUIRING WE DISMISS PLFFS JOSEPH ECKERT'S, STEVEN EVANS', PHILIP METCALFE'S, CRAIG MILLISON'S PAULA SCHOTT'S & STANLEY SUWALA'S CLAIMS IN COUNT IV. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 9/5/17. 9/5/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GENE R. ROMERO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-3894 CONSOLIDATED WITH ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. 01-6764 (Romero II) 03-6872 (Romero III) 15-1049 (Abell) 15-2602 (Tabor) 15-3047 (Anzivine) ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on the Phase III Plaintiffs' ADEA disparate treatment claims (Count IV) (ECF Doc. No. 1174), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1184), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1192) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1174) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding judgment as a matter of law barring these disparate treatment claims as untimely and requiring we DISMISS Plaintiffs Joseph Eckert's, Steven Evans', Philip Metcalfe's, Craig Millison's, Paula Schott's and Stanley Suwala's claims in Count IV.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?