ROMERO, et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE, et al

Filing 859

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW UNDER RULE 50(B) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59, PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION, DEFENDANTS' REPLY AND FOR REASONS IN THE ACCOMPANY MEMORANDUM IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/4/16. 5/4/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED/EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENE R. ROMERO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

NO. 01-3894
CONSOLIDATED WITH:
Nos. 01-6764, 03-6872, 15-1017, 15-1049,
15-1190, 15-2602, 15-2961, 15-3047

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of May 2016, upon consideration of the Defendants' Renewed
Motion for Judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) or, in the alternative, for a new trial
under Rule 59 (ECF Doc. No. 825), Plaintiffs' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 840), Defendants'
Reply (ECF Doc. No. 846), and for reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED
the Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 825) is DENIED.