AUSTIN v. GILLIS, et al

Filing 36

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF A 5/21/03 ORDER (ECF DOC. NO. 33) AND FOR REASONS IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS ORDERED THAT PLFF'S MOTION (ECF DOC. NO. 33) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 9/18/17. 9/19/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND D.A.-PHILA. COUNTY, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL. (pr, ) Modified on 9/19/2017 (pr, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION ROBERT AUSTIN v. NO. 01-7325 THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of September 2017, upon considering the Plaintiffs Motion for reconsideration of a May 21, 2003 Order (ECF Doc. No. 33), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is DENIED. ORDERED Plaintiffs Motion (ECF Doc. No. 33) is

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?