FISHER v. BEARD, et al

Filing 35

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/10/09. 8/11/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA J O N A T H A N FISHER, P e titio n e r v. J E F F R E Y BEARD, et al., R esp o n d en ts : : : : : : : C IV IL ACTION N O . 02-1764 ORDER S T E N G E L , J. A N D NOW, this 10th day of August, 2009, upon careful and independent c o n sid e ra tio n of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough a n d well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge T im o th y R. Rice, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. T h e petitioner's objections are OVERRULED; T h e Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; T h e petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice; T h e re is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; T h e Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. B Y THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?