GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR PUERTO RICO, AND PUERTO RICO MARITIME SHIPPING AUTHORITY v. HOLT MARINE TERMINAL, INC. et al

Filing 177

ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFTS BROAD AND WASHINGTON CORP., DELAWARE AVENUE ENTERPRISES, INC., GLOUCESTER MARINE TERMINAL, INC., EXPRESS EQUIPMENT RENTAL CO., OAE INC., PORTSIDE REFRIGERATED SERVICES, INC., THE TANGLE FOOT CORP., ESSEX ENTERPRISES, INC., SLS SERVICES, INC., HOLT OVERSIGHT & LOGISTICAL TECHNOLOGIES,INC., THOMAS HOLT, JR., LEO HOLT AND MICHAEL HOLT FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED FOR THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFTS & AGAINST PLFFS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFTS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF LOUIS R. PICHINI S DENIED AS MOOT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/24/11. 3/24/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR PUERTO RICO, et ale CIVIL ACTION v. HOLT MARINE TERMINAL, et ale INC., NO. 02-7825 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Broad and Washington Corporation, Delaware Avenue Enterprises, Inc., Gloucester Marine Terminal, Inc., Express Equipment Rental Co., OAE, Inc., Portside Refrigerated Services, Inc., The Tanglefoot Corporation, Essex Enterprises, Inc., SLS Services, Inc., Holt Oversight & Logistical Technologies, Inc., Thomas Holt, Jr., Leo Holt and Michael Holt (Docket No. 135); the opposition, reply, and supplemental briefs thereto; and after oral argument held on December 13, 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED for IT IS the above-named defendants and against the plaintiffs. FURTHER ORDERED that the above-named defendants' Motion to Preclude Expert Testimony of Louis R. Pichini (Docket No. 136) is DENIED AS MOOT. BY THE COURT: .-~ ~' J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?