GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR PUERTO RICO, AND PUERTO RICO MARITIME SHIPPING AUTHORITY v. HOLT MARINE TERMINAL, INC. et al
ORDER THAT PLFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFTS ORCHARD HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & THOMAS HOLT, SR. IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/14/11. 4/15/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK
FOR PUERTO RICO, et al.
HOLT MARINE TERMINAL, INC.,
AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2011, upon
consideration of the plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Summary
Judgment against defendants Orchard Hill Development Corporation
and Thomas Holt, Sr. (Docket No. 139), the Motion for Summary
Judgment of defendants Thomas Holt, Sr., and Orchard Hill
Development Corporation (Docket No. 138), the opposition,
replies, and supplemental briefing thereto, and following oral
argument held on December 13, 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the
reasons stated in a Memorandum of Law bearing today’s date, that:
The plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Summary
Judgment is DENIED.
The Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants
Orchard Hill Development Corporation and Thomas Holt, Sr. is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
The motion is GRANTED with
respect to the plaintiffs’ alter ego claim against Orchard Hill,
and the plaintiffs’ veil piercing claim involving NPR and the
The motion is DENIED in all other respects.
On or before April 29, 2011, the parties shall
confer with one another and inform the Court by letter how they
wish to proceed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?