JURINKO et al v. THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE CO.

Filing 127

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEYS FEES AND STATUTORY INTEREST (DOC. NO. 110) IS DENIED. IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S AMENDED MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL (DOC. NO. 121) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/30/09. 7/30/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(lisad, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ : STEPHEN P. JURINKO, et al., : Plaintiffs, : v. : CASE NO. 03-CV-4053 : THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE CO., : Defendant. : ____________________________________ : ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of July 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Supplemental Attorneys Fees and Statutory Interest [Doc. No. 110], Defendant's Response in opposition [Doc. Nos. 112 & 113], Plaintiffs' Reply [Doc. No. 114], and Defendant's Sur-reply [Doc. No. 120], it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion [Doc. No. 110] is DENIED. Also, upon consideration of Defendant's Amended Motion for Partial Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) [Doc. No. 121], Plaintiffs' Response in opposition [Doc. No. 123], and Defendant's Reply [Doc. No. 124], it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ________________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?