GROSSMAN et al v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. et al

Filing 1023

ORDER THAT THE SITTHIDETHS'S MOTION (DOC. NOS. 1009, 1013) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 3/28/16. 3/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(mbh, ) Modified on 3/28/2016 (lisad, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE DVI, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CIVIL ACTION No. 03-5336 ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the moving papers filed by Kam Sitthidet and Ron Sitthideth (together, “the Sitthideths”), requesting exclusion from this Class action, and requesting to opt out of the Stipulations and the Settlements between Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants, and upon further consideration of the papers submitted by Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class, Clinton A. Krislove, Esq. and Michael R. Karnuth, Esq. of Krislove & Associates, Ltd., and the papers submitted by Defendants Deloitte & Touche LLP, Harry T. J. Roberts, and John P. Boyle,1 it is hereby ORDERED that the Sitthideths’s Motion (Doc. Nos. 1009, 1013) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Legrome D. Davis Legrome D. Davis, J. 1 See Sitthideths’s “Motion to Reconsider a Few Class Members” (Doc. No. 1009); L. Pls./Class Counsel’s Resp. (Doc. No. 1010); “Sitthidet Response and Rebuttal,” with Ex. B, the Sitthideths’s TD Ameritrade statement (Doc. No. 1013); L. Pls./Class Counsel’s Reply (Doc. No. 1014), with Ex. 1, K. Sitthidet’s letter, dated Sept. 17, 2015 (Doc. No. 1014-2). See also Def. Deloitte’s letter, dated Oct. 1, 2015 (Doc. No. 1016), requesting reconsideration of the Order, dated Sept. 23, 2015; Defs. Roberts’s and Boyle’s letter, dated Jan. 28, 2016, joining in Deloitte’s letter request (Doc. No. 1021). See further L. Pls./Class Counsel’s “Position on Sitthideths’ Request to Be Excluded” (Doc. No. 1018); L. Pls./Class Counsel’s Submission, with J. Bravata Decl., dated Jan. 28, 2016, and Exs. 1-2 (Doc. No. 1020).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?