BEHREND et al v. COMCAST CORPORATION

Filing 569

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF REVISED PHILADELPHIA CLASS 564 , AND ALL DOCUMENTS FILED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDE RED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS ARE DIRECTED TO FILE A SUBSTANTIVE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF REVISED PHILADELPHIA CLASS 560 NO LATER THAN 12/6/2013. PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE NO LATER THAN 12/26/2013. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 11/12/13. 11/12/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANFORD GLABERSON, et al. v. COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-6604 ORDER AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Strike Motion for Certification of Revised Philadelphia Class (Docket No. 564), and all documents filed in connection therewith, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion is DENIED. 2. Defendants are DIRECTED to file a substantive Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of Revised Philadelphia Class (Docket No. 560) no later than December 6, 2013. 3. Plaintiffs may file a Reply to Defendants’ Response no later than December 26, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ John R. Padova ______________________ John R. Padova, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?