HOGAN v. GILLIS et al

Filing 42

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO REOPEN PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RULE 60 (b)(2) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO HOLD PETITIONER'S RULE 60 (b) MOTION IN ABEYANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO INFORM THE COURT OF STATE LITIGATION DEVELOPMENTS ARE GRANTED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 9/16/22. 9/16/22 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(JL)

Case 2:04-cv-00957-ER Document 42 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN HOGAN,
Petitioner,
v.
FRANK D. GILLIS, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 04-957

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2022, in consideration
of Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2) and (6) [ECF No.
30] and Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Motion [ECF No.
39] it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ordered that:
Petitioner’s Motion to Hold Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) Motion
in Abeyance [ECF No. 31] while he litigates in state court is
DENIED AS MOOT; and
Petitioner’s Motions to Inform the Court of State
Litigation Developments [ECF Nos. 35 and 36] are GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:
______________________
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.