PICHLER et al v. UNITE (UNION OF NEEDLESTRADES, INDUSTRIAL & TEXTILE EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO) et al

Filing 286

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT UNITES MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 281) IS DENIED. UNITES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF MULTIPLE STATUTORY DAMAGES IS GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED, UNITES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. BY 8/20/09 THE PARTIES SHALL FILE THEIR PROPOSALS CONCERNING CLASS WIDE-RELIEF.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 8/11/09. 8/11/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH PICHLER, et al. : : v. : : UNITE (UNION OF NEEDLETRADES, : INDUSTRIAL & TEXTILE EMPLOYEES: AFL-CIO), et al. : ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2009, upon consideration of defendant UNITE's motion for reconsideration of our June 5, 2009 Order (docket entry #281), UNITE's motion for summary judgement on the question of multiple statutory damages (docket entry #274), UNITE's motion for summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages (docket entry #275), the plaintiffs' respective responses, and the replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. UNITE's motion for reconsideration is DENIED; UNITE's motion for summary judgment on the issue CIVIL ACTION

NO. 04-2841

of multiple statutory damages is GRANTED as unopposed; 3. UNITE's motion for summary judgment on the issue

of punitive damages is GRANTED; and

4.

By August 20, 2009, the parties shall FILE their

proposals concerning class-wide relief.1

BY THE COURT: __\s\Stewart Dalzell

This is to say, the usual proposed materials associated with a Rule 23 settlement such as forms of notice and proof of claim forms. We afford the parties a short deadline given that since August of 2006 they have known we would come to this moment in the drama after the Court of Appeals acted, which it did eleven months ago. The substance of this paragraph of this Order can therefore hardly come as a surprise. 2

1