GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY v. FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO. et al

Filing 418

ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING ARE DENIED: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY AND FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REGULATORY ISSUES. LEXINGTON INS URANCE COMPANY AND AIU INSURANCE COMPANY'S JOINDER IN HARTFORD AND FIRST STATE'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REGULATORY ISSUES. CERTAIN DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISREGARD THE DECLARATION OF MICAHEL R. POWERS, PH.D.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 2/21/2012. 2/22/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY
v.
FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 04-3509

ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2012, the following are denied:
C

“Plaintiff General Refractories Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Against All Defendants (doc. nos. 311, 312 (sealed)).

C

“Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and First State Insurance
Company’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Regulatory Issues (doc.
nos. 321, 323 (sealed)).

C

“Lexington Insurance Company and AIU Insurance Company’s Joinder in
Hartford and First State’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment Against All Defendants and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
on Regulatory Issues” (doc. nos. 322, 366).

C

“Certain Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding
Plaintiff’s Claim That Defendants’ Asbestos-Related Exclusions Are Invalid
and Unenforceable” (doc. no. 324 (sealed)).

C

“Defendants’ Motion to Strike and Disregard the Declaration of Michael R.
Powers, Ph.D.” (doc. no. 354).

A memorandum accompanies this order.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edmund V. Ludwig
Edmund V. Ludwig, J.