JOHANNESSEN v. SULZER MEDICA USA, INC. et al

Filing 53

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 46) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 47) IS DENIED. THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 37) IS DISMISSED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 5/20/09. 5/21/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NILS JOHANNESSEN v. SULZER MEDICA USA, INC., ET AL. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-3791 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants Sulzer Medica, Inc., Centerpulse, Inc., and Zimmer Holdings, Inc., for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46) and Plaintiff Nils Johannessen's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Zimmer's Motion for Summary Judgement and in Support of his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Sulzer Medica USA, Inc., and Centerpulse USA, Inc. (Doc. No. 47), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. 3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is DENIED. The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 37) is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: _________________________ R. Barclay Surrick, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?