WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
105
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART;. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 2/22/12. 2/23/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
HAROLD C. WILSON
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PIDLADELPIDA, et aI.,
Defendants.
NO. 04-5396
ORDER
NOW, this 22M day ofFebrtllU)', 2012, upon consideration ofthe Motion of Defendaot,
R. Seth Williams, to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of
the Federai Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 96) and Plaintiffs Response thereto, for the reasons
provided in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 96) is GRANTED IN PART
and DENIED IN PART;
2. Insofar as Defendant's Motion requests that any and all state law claims
against Defendant Williams be dismissed, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED;
3. Insofar as Defendant's Motion requests that Plaintiffs claims against
Mr. Williams be dismissed as time-barred and for lack of Mr. Williams' personal involvement,
Defendant's Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
L Rt&! rfD
.,,1
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?