WILLIAM A. GRAHAM COMPANY v. HAUGHEY et al

Filing 287

AMENDED JUDGEMENT THAT THE MOTION OF THE PLAINTIFF WILLIAM A. GRAHAM COMPANY D/B/A THE GRAHAM COMPANY TO AMEND THE JUNE 28, 2006 JUDGMENT TO INCLUDE PREJUDGMENT AND POSTJUDGMENT INTEREST IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/12/10. 5/13/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(dp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM A. GRAHAM COMPANY d/b/a THE GRAHAM COMPANY v. THOMAS P. HAUGHEY AND USI MIDATLANTIC, INC. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-612 AMENDED JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2010, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of the plaintiff William A. Graham Company d/b/a The Graham Company to amend the June 28, 2006 judgment to include prejudgment and postjudgment interest is GRANTED; (2) the June 28, 2006 judgment in favor of William A. Graham Company d/b/a The Graham Company is amended to include an award of $4,112,859 in prejudgment interest against defendant USI MidAtlantic, Inc. for a total judgment of $20,674,089 and an award of $570,542 in prejudgment interest against defendant Thomas P. Haughey for a total judgment of $2,867,939; and (3) the June 28, 2006 judgment in favor of William A. Graham Company d/b/a The Graham Company is also amended to include an award of postjudgment interest against defendants USI MidAtlantic, Inc. and Thomas P. Haughey to be calculated from June 28, 2006 to the date of payment at an annual interest rate of 5.24% compounded annually. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III C.J. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?