COMAPER CORPORATION v. ANTEC, INC. et al
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFT'S INITIAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OF INVALIDITY (DOC. #174) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (DOCS. #187, #188) ARE GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 4/2/2012; 4/3/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTEC, INC., ET AL.,
AND NOW, this ____ day of April 2012, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc. 174), Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a
Matter of Law, or, in the Alternative, New Trial (Docs. 187, 188), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 199),
Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 201), Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (Doc. 204), and all accompanying briefs and
relevant correspondence, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
Defendant’s initial Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc.
174) is DENIED AS MOOT, and
Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docs. 187, 188)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
This Order accompanies the memorandum issued by the Court on April 2, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?