BRO-TECH CORPORATION et al v. THERMAX, INC. et al

Filing 473

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER PROTECTING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 5/6/09. 5/8/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ : BRO-TECH CORPORATION t/a : THE PUROLITE COMPANY, et al., : Plaintiffs, : v. : CIVIL NO. 05-CV-2330 : THERMAX, INC. d/b/a THERMAX : USA LTD, et al., : Defendants. : ____________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of May 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion For An Order Protecting Confidential Information [Doc. No. 468], and Defendant Thermax, Inc.'s Response [Doc. No. 469], and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; it is granted in that National Economic Research Associates agents Phillip Beutel and Christine Meyer remain bound by the terms of the confidentiality agreements they entered into in the above-captioned action, but denied in that this Court declines to render further rulings as to the applicability of the confidentiality agreements established herein to the related action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, National Economic Research Associates v. Purolite "C" Corporation d/b/a The Purolite Company, No. 08-Civ-07600 (Lynch, J.). It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe _______________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?