E. et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF EDUCATION

Filing 132

ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 94) IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO PERMIT TESTIMONY OF HEARING OFFICER ROSEMARY MULLALY AT TRIAL (DOCKET NO. 95) IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFFS' RIGHTS TO APPLY FOR LEAVE TO REOPEN AND SUPPLEMENT THESE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAPERS TO THE EXTENT THEY ERRED IN THEIR UNDERSTANDING AS TO THE "RECORD" ON WHICH THEY COULD OR SHOULD BAS E THEIR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND/OR AS TO THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO RAISE SUCH ISSUES. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFFS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/24/11. 10/24/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD E. and LESLIE A. CHAMBERS, as GUARDIANS of FERREN CHAMBERS an incapacitated person and RONALD E. and LESLIE A. CHAMBERS, in their own right Plaintiffs, v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 05-2535 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs (Docket No. 94), the Motion in Limine filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs to permit the testimony of Hearing Officer Rosemary Mullaly at trial or, in the alternative, to admit her written administrative decision into evidence (Docket No. 95), and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant School District of Philadelphia Board of Education (Docket No. 100), and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs (Docket No. 94) is DENIED. 2. The Motion in Limine filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs (Docket No. 95) is DENIED. 1 3. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant School District (Docket No. 100) is GRANTED without prejudice to the Chambers Plaintiffs’ rights to apply for leave to re-open and supplement these summary judgment papers to the extent they erred in their understanding as to the “record” on which they could or should base their summary judgment motion and/or as to their obligations to raise such issues. 4. The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of the Defendant School District of Philadelphia Board of Education, and against the Chambers Plaintiffs. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?