ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V. v. THE PUROLITE COMPANY

Filing 133

ORDER THAT DEFT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW WITH RESPECT TO ITS CLAIM ON THE INADMISSIBILITY AT TRIAL OF THE GTCS IS DENIED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/14/10. ) 10/15/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, ) Modified on 10/15/2010 (gn, ).

ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V. v. THE PUROLITE COMPANY

Doc. 133

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V., Plaintiff, v. THE PUROLITE COMPANY,

Defendant.

: : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-3078

ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant The Purolite Company's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. No. 117), Plaintiff ECEM European Chemical Marketing B.V.'s Response in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 124), and arguments of counsel for the parties at the hearing held on September 7, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Opinion dated October 14, 2010, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Renewed Motion for a Judgment as a Matter of Law with respect to its claim on the inadmissibility at trial of the GTCS is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J

Dockets.Justia.com