ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V. v. THE PUROLITE COMPANY

Filing 88

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC #61) IS DENIED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/29/10. ) 1/29/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V., Plaintiff, v. THE PUROLITE COMPANY,

Defendant.

: : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-3078

ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2010, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence of Prior Negotiations Leading Up to the 2004 Contract (Doc. No. 61), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 69), Plaintiff's Reply on Parol Evidence Issues (Doc. No. 73), Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Support of the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 80), and Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 81), and for the reasons stated in the Opinion dated January 29, 2010, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 61) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J