S. et al v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA

Filing 36

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS NEENA S., ROBERT S. AND TAMI S.'s MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES, DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA'S RESPONSE AND PLAINTIFFS' REPLY THERETO, AND FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE FOREGO ING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IS GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $78,111.15 FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND $2,748.11 FOR COSTS FOR A TOTAL OF $80,859.26. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/27/09. 7/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NEENA S., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS, ROBERT AND TAMI S., AND ROBERT AND TAMI S., ADULTS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON THEIR OWN BEHALF v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ORDER : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-5404 AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2009, upon consideration of plaintiffs Neena S., Robert S. and Tami S.'s motion for attorneys' fees, defendant School District of Philadelphia's response and plaintiffs' reply thereto, and for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED in the amount of $78,111.15 for attorneys' fees and $2,748.11 for costs for a total of $80,859.26. /s/ THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR. THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?