FIRST KOREAN CHURCH OF NEW YORK. INC. v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD et al

Filing 213

ORDER THAT THE SECOND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF FIRST KOREAN IS DENIED. THE SECOND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS IS GRANTED. THE MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF FIRST KOREAN IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 2/28/2012. 2/29/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FIRST KOREAN CHURCH OF NEW YORK, INC. v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD and CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP : : : : : : : Norma L. Shapiro, J. CIVIL ACTION No. 05-6389 February 29, 2012 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of plaintiff First Korean’s Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 134), defendants Cheltenham Township Zoning Hearing Board’s and Cheltenham Township’s response thereto (paper no. 138), defendants’ Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 133), First Korean’s response thereto (paper no. 140), and First Korean’s Motion for Expedited Rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment (paper no. 203), for the reasons stated in the attached memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of First Korean (paper no. 134) is DENIED. 2. The Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants (paper no. 133) is GRANTED. 3. The Motion for Expedited Rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment of First Korean (paper no. 203) is DENIED AS MOOT. /s/ Norma L. Shapiro J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?