FIRST KOREAN CHURCH OF NEW YORK. INC. v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD et al
Filing
213
ORDER THAT THE SECOND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF FIRST KOREAN IS DENIED. THE SECOND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS IS GRANTED. THE MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF FIRST KOREAN IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 2/28/2012. 2/29/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FIRST KOREAN CHURCH OF NEW
YORK, INC.
v.
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING
HEARING BOARD and
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Norma L. Shapiro, J.
CIVIL ACTION
No. 05-6389
February 29, 2012
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of plaintiff First
Korean’s Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 134), defendants
Cheltenham Township Zoning Hearing Board’s and Cheltenham Township’s response thereto
(paper no. 138), defendants’ Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 133),
First Korean’s response thereto (paper no. 140), and First Korean’s Motion for Expedited
Rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment (paper no. 203), for the reasons stated in the attached
memorandum, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of First Korean (paper no. 134)
is DENIED.
2. The Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants (paper no. 133) is
GRANTED.
3. The Motion for Expedited Rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment of First Korean
(paper no. 203) is DENIED AS MOOT.
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?