VEZEAU, ET AL v. PFIZER, INC.

Filing 95

ORDER THAT DEFT PFIZER INC.,'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 42) IS GRANTED IN PART, & DENIED IN PART, CONSISTENT WITH THE MEMORANDUM FILED HEREWITH. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT IF RELATORS WISH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THEY MUST DO SO WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/29/16. 3/2/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL: COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS ON 2/29/16.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
ex rel. CATHERINE A. BROWN and
BERNARD G. VEZEAU,
v.
PFIZER, INC.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 05-6795

ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of

February

, 2016, upon consideration of

Defendant Pfizer Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 42), and all documents submitted in support
thereof, and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part, and
DENIED in part, consistent with the Memorandum filed herewith. It is further ORDERED that
if Relators wish to file an Amended Complaint, they must do so within fourteen (14) days of this
Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

___________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.