COOPER v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Filing 145

ORDER THAT PLFFS' MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT (DOC #129) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. PLFFS' ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC #129) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/6/11. ) 9/7/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALLISON COOPER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-888 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of September 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. No. 129), Defendant’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 135), Plaintiffs’ Reply in further support of the Motion (Doc. No. 137), the arguments of counsel at the June 15, 2011 hearing on the Motion, Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Brief in further support of the Motion (Doc. No. 141), and in accordance with the Opinion of this Court dated September 6, 2011, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. No. 129) is DENIED with prejudice. 2. Plaintiffs’ Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. No. 129) is DENIED without prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?