COOPER v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Filing
145
ORDER THAT PLFFS' MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT (DOC #129) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. PLFFS' ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC #129) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/6/11. ) 9/7/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALLISON COOPER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 06-888
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of September 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Approve Settlement (Doc. No. 129), Defendant’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 135), Plaintiffs’
Reply in further support of the Motion (Doc. No. 137), the arguments of counsel at the June 15, 2011
hearing on the Motion, Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Brief in further support of the Motion (Doc. No.
141), and in accordance with the Opinion of this Court dated September 6, 2011, it is ORDERED
as follows:
1.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. No. 129) is DENIED with prejudice.
2.
Plaintiffs’ Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. No. 129) is DENIED
without prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J.
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?