REYNOLDS et al v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Filing 129

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE RELATING TO ANURAG HARSH IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES IS GRANTED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/2/10. 6/2/10 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK REYNOLDS v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2010, in consideration of plaintiff's Motion to Preclude Evidence Relating to Anurag Harsh, defendant's response thereto, defendant's Motion to Exclude Evidence of Subsequent Remedial Measures and plaintiff's response thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1) 2) Plaintiff's motion is DENIED; and Defendant's motion is GRANTED. CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1237 /s/ THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR. THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?