REYNOLDS et al v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Filing 172

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL IS DENEID; THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW IS GRANTED, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE JUDGMENT ENTERED 6/22/2010 IS VACATED AND JUDGEMENT IS ENTER ED IN FAVOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA AND AGAINST FRANK REYNOLDS; THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND THE JUDGEMENT TO ADD PREJUDGEMENT INTEREST IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/25/2010. 10/25/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kk, )

Download PDF
REYNOLDS et al v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al Doc. 172 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK REYNOLDS v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2010, after consideration of Frank Reynolds's motion for a new trial and The University of Pennsylvania's response thereto, it is ORDERED that Reynolds's motion is DENIED. After consideration of Penn's motion for judgement as a matter of law, Reynolds's response and Penn's reply, it is ORDERED that Penn's motion is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the judgement entered June 22, 2010 is VACATED and JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED in favor of The University of Pennsylvania and against Frank Reynolds. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Reynolds's motion to amend the judgment to add prejudgment interest is DENIED as moot. CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1237 /s/ THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR. THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR., J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?