SCHNELLER et al v. FOX SUBACUTE AT CLARA BURKE et al
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS, THE PLAINTIF'S RESPONSE THERETO, AND AFTER A STATUS HEARING WITH ALL PARTIES PRESENT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL REMAINING MOTIONS IN THIS CASE ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS ACTION CLOSE FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 6/25/09. 6/26/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA J A M E S D. SCHNELLER, et al., Plaintiffs v. F O X SUBACUTE AT C L A R A BURKE, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : C IV IL ACTION
ORDER A N D NOW, this 25th day of June, 2009, upon consideration of the defendants' m o tio n s to dismiss (Documents #35, 38, 41, 55), the plaintiff's response thereto (D o c u m e n t #72), and after a status hearing with all parties present, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the motions to dismiss are GRANTED in their entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions in this case are DENIED a s moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this action CLOSED for all purposes.
B Y THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?