DIMEO v. MAX
Filing
10
ORDER THAT THE REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS IS DENIED. BY NOON ON MAY 12, 2006, PLAINTIFF MAY SUBMIT A CONSOLIDATED SUR-REPLY MEMORANDUM NO TO EXCEED TEN PAGES IN LENGTH. SIGNED BY JUDGE STEWART DALZELL ON 05/10/06. 05/12/06 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. COPIES FAXED BY CHAMBERS 05/10/06.(ac, )
<![CDATA[
DIMEO v. MAX
Doc. 10
Case 2:06-cv-01544-SD
Document 10
Filed 05/12/2006
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY DIMEO, III v. TUCKER MAX : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's letter, dated today, requesting a "consolidated hearing" on the pending motions in this matter or, in the alternative, the opportunity for further briefing, and the Court finding no need for a hearing, but out of deference to plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. The request for a hearing is DENIED; By noon on May 12, 2006, plaintiff may SUBMIT a CIVIL ACTION
NO. 06-1544
consolidated sur-reply memorandum not to exceed ten pages in length; and 3. If plaintiff elects to file a sur-reply, he shall
FAX (FAX #: 215-580-2156) a courtesy copy to us.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
