DIMEO v. MAX

Filing 6

ORDER THAT BY NOON ON 5/9/06, DEFENDANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND BY THE SAME TIME AND DATE, DEFENDANT MAY FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS; ETC.. SIGNED BY JUDGE STEWART DALZELL ON 5/3/06. 5/4/06 ENTERED AND E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jl, )

Download PDF
DIMEO v. MAX Doc. 6 Case 2:06-cv-01544-SD Document 6 Filed 05/03/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY DIMEO, III v. TUCKER MAX : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2006, upon consideration of defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice (docket entry # 2), plaintiff's petition to remand this matter (docket entry # 3), and plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss (docket entry ## 4-5), which incorporates a motion to file an amended complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. By noon on May 9, 2006, defendant shall FILE a CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1544 response to plaintiff's motion to remand and a response to the motion to file an amended complaint; and 2. By the same time and date, defendant may FILE a reply to plaintiff's response in opposition to the motion to dismiss. BY THE COURT: /s/ Stewart Dalzell, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?