VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
Filing
286
ORDER THAT THE END PAYOR CLASS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED IN THE OPION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 3/13/2014. 3/13/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
______________________________________________________________________________
:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., :
CIVIL ACTION
et al.,
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
No. 2:06-cv-1797
:
CEPHALON, INC., et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
_________________________________________ :__________________________________
:
VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC., et al.,
:
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
No. 2:06-cv-1833
:
CEPHALON, INC., et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
_________________________________________ :__________________________________
:
APOTEX, INC.,
:
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
No. 2:06-cv-2768
:
CEPHALON, INC., et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
_________________________________________ :___________________________________
:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
:
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
No. 2:08-cv-2141
:
CEPHALON, INC.,
:
Defendant.
:
_________________________________________ :__________________________________
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Direct Purchaser
Class Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Patent Issues (06-1797, doc. no.
518), the End Payor Class Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (06-1833, doc. no.
233), and Apotex’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Antitrust Liability and
Monopoly Power (06-2768, doc. no. 601), Cephalon and the Generic Defendants’ responses
thereto, and the replies, and for the reasons detailed in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion,
it is hereby ORDERED that:
The Direct Purchasers’ motion is GRANTED IN PART, as outlined in the
opinion.
The End Payors’ motion is GRANTED IN PART, as outlined in the opinion.
Apotex’s motion is GRANTED IN PART, as outlined in the opinion. The
monopoly power portion of Apotex’s motion will be resolved separately.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
______________________________
Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?