VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al

Filing 527

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING DECISION ON THE RULE 23(f) APPEAL IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK 06-1833 CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/17/2015. 12/17/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ______________________________________________________________________________ : KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION et al., : Plaintiffs, : : v. : No. 2:06-cv-1797 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : _________________________________________ :__________________________________ : VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC., et al., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : v. : No. 2:06-cv-1833 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : _________________________________________ :__________________________________ : APOTEX, INC., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 2:06-cv-2768 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : _________________________________________ :___________________________________ ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of “Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd. and Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision on Their Rule 23(f) Appeal” (Dkt. No. 06-1797, Doc. No. 871; Dkt. No. 06-1833, Doc. No. 470; Dkt. No. 06-2768, Doc. No. 923), the responses and reply thereto, and following oral argument and an on-therecord telephone conference, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED with respect 1 to the Direct Purchasers (including the Individual Plaintiffs1) and Apotex. The liability trial scheduled for February 2, 2016 will proceed with respect to those parties. It is further ORDERED that, in light of the agreement between the parties, the motion is GRANTED with respect to the End Payors only and the Clerk of Court SHALL mark Vista Healthplan, Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al. (No. 2:06-cv-1833) closed for statistical purposes and place that matter in the Civil Suspense File. . BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg, J. ______________________________ Mitchell S. Goldberg, J. 1 The Individual Plaintiffs are owners and operators of retail pharmacies who have filed their own separate actions, and are excluded from the definition of the Direct Purchaser Litigation Class. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?