COLON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TIME-BARRED. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 5/8/07. 5/9/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
COLON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al Doc. 17 Case 2:06-cv-02263-PBT Document 17 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE COLON, Petitioner, v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, ET AL., Respondent. : : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of May, 2007, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell and pro se Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that: 1. 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TIME-BARRED. 3. 4. There is no probable cause for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as CLOSED. CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-2263 BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker Honorable Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?