WILSON v. ZIELKE et al

Filing 77

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE FOR COURT SUPERVISION OF VIDEO DEPOSITIONS IS DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT EVIDENCE OF PLAINTIFF' ;S PRIOR LAWSUIT AGAINST WAWA IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AS EXPLAINED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF PLAINTIFF'S ALCHOLISM AND/OR SUBSTANCE ABUSE IS GRANTED AS LIMITED BY THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 4/13/09. 4/15/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PATRICK WILSON, Plaintiff, v. KATE ZIELKE, et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-2450

ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 27) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine for Court Supervision of Video Depositions (Docket No. 46) is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice. 3. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence of Plaintiff's Prior Lawsuit Against WaWa (Docket No. 42) is DENIED. 4. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Docket No. 50) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as explained in the Court's Memorandum. 5. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Regarding the Admissibility of Evidence of Plaintiff's Alcoholism and/or Substance Abuse. (Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED as limited by the Court's Memorandum. 6. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 75) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ C. Darnell Jones II _________________________ C. DARNELL JONES II J.