WILSON v. KING et al
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM/OPINION AND ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO.80) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 2/24/10.3/2/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(kk, )
<![CDATA[
Case 2:06-cv-02608-PBT Document 91
Filed 02/24/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EDWARD K. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. LEON KING, ET AL., Defendants.
: : : : : : :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-CV-2608
ORDER AND NOW, on this ____ day of February, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Answer to Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 80) and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 84), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that the Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ___________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
