KABASHA GRIFFIN-EL v. BEARD et al

Filing 202

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MOYER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS CANINO, GALINSKI, DIGUGLIELMO, SCARPATI, THOMAS, DOMBROSKY LORENZO, DOHMANAND SHAYLOR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR O F DEFENDANTS CANINO, GALINSKI, DIGUGLIELMO, SCARPATI, THOMAS, DOMBROSKY, LORENZO, DOHMAN AND SHAYLOR AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT MOYER ARE DIRECTED TO CALL THE COURT ON 1/31/13 AT 11:0 AM TO DISCUSS A TRIAL DATE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL COORDINATE THE CALL. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 1/22/13. 1/22/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA K. KABASHA GRIFFIN-EL a/k/a KEITH FEDELE GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-2719 ORDER L. FELIPE RESTREPO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JANUARY 22, 2013 AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2013, upon consideration of the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, attached Statement of Undisputed Facts, and Appendix (Docs #192, 193), the plaintiff’s Response in Opposition, attached Statement of Undisputed Facts, and Supplemental Appendix (Docs. # 196, 197), and defendants’ Reply Brief and Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (Docs. # 198, 199), it is hereby ORDERED that 1. Defendant Moyer’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED; 2. Defendant Canino’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Canino and against plaintiff; 3. Defendant Galinski’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Galinski and against plaintiff; 4. Defendant DiGuglielmo’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant DiGuglielmo and against plaintiff; 5. Defendant Scarpati’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Scarpati and against plaintiff; 6. Defendant Thomas’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Thomas and against plaintiff; 7. Defendant Dombrosky’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dombrosky and against plaintiff; 8. Defendant Lorenzo’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Lorenzo and against plaintiff; 9. Defendant Dohman’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dohman and against plaintiff; 10. Defendant Shaylor’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant Shaylor and against plaintiff; 11. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant Moyer are directed to call the court on January 31 at 11:30 a.m. to discuss a trial date. Plaintiff’s counsel shall coordinate the call. st BY THE COURT: /s/ L. Felipe Restrepo L. Felipe Restrepo United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?