BOWEN v. PALAKOVICH et al
Filing
75
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ARE DENIED AND DISMISSED. NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 9/22/13. 9/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND FAXED FROM CHAMBERS. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DWIGHT BOWEN
:
:
:
:
:
v.
JOHN PALKOVICH, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 06-3378
ORDER
AND NOW, this
22nd
day of
September
, 2014, upon consideration of
Petitioner Dwight D. Bowen’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), Amended
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 27), and Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (ECF No. 44), and after a de novo review of the record and after review of the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo (ECF No. 65) and
Petitioner’s pro se Objections (ECF No. 71) to the Report and Recommendation, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus, and Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED and
DISMISSED.
4. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/R. Barclay Surrick
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?