BOWEN v. PALAKOVICH et al

Filing 75

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ARE DENIED AND DISMISSED. NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 9/22/13. 9/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND FAXED FROM CHAMBERS. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DWIGHT BOWEN : : : : : v. JOHN PALKOVICH, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3378 ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of September , 2014, upon consideration of Petitioner Dwight D. Bowen’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 27), and Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 44), and after a de novo review of the record and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo (ECF No. 65) and Petitioner’s pro se Objections (ECF No. 71) to the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED and DISMISSED. 4. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/R. Barclay Surrick U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?