GLENN et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 98

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE CITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; SEPTA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; AMTRAK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: AMTRAK'S MOTION IN LIMINE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IS DENIED AS MOOT; AMTRAK'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IS GRANTED; THE CITY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IS GRANTED; SEPTA'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/22/09. 4/23/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERIC ROONEY, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., : : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3480

ORDER AND NOW, this 22 day of April 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, (1) the City's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 76) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) SEPTA's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 77) is GRANTED; (3) AMTRAK's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 79) is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: (1) AMTRAK's motion in limine and motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. nos. 78, 91) is DENIED as moot; (2) AMTRAK's motions for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 90) is GRANTED; (3) the City's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 93) is GRANTED;

(4)

SEPTA's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 89) is GRANTED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Eduardo C. Robrreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.