URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. et al v. BCBG MAX AZRIA GROUP, INC. et al

Filing 278

ORDER THAT WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, PLAINTIFFS SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTS, AS OUTLINED HEREIN; AND WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, DEFENDANTS SHALL COMMUNICATE TO PLAINTIFFS ANY QUESTIONS, OBJECTIONS, OR REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE AWARD OF FEES IN THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/2/2010. 3/3/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(md)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA U R B A N OUTFITTERS, INC., et al. v. B C B G MAX AZRIA GROUP, INC., et al. : : : N O . 06-4003 C IV IL ACTION ORDER A N D NOW, this 2 nd day of March, 2010, based on the foregoing Memorandum R e : Remand from the Third Circuit, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. W i th i n fourteen (14) days, Plaintiffs shall submit to defense counsel a copy of all b i lls and invoices submitted to their clients in connection with this case, together with attorney t im e records and expenses, including any discounts or special terms of payment applicable to this case. 2. W ith in fourteen (14) days, Defendants shall communicate to Plaintiffs any q u e s t i o n s , objections, or requests for further information concerning the award of fees in this case. 3. W ith in fourteen (14) days thereafter, the parties shall file, if they can agree, a s tip u la tio n of the amount of fees and expenses to be paid pursuant to the Memorandum and O rd e r , or if there is disagreement, each side shall file a brief as to their contentions, not more than te n (10) pages in length, double-spaced, and may attach a summary of the relevant billing and tim e and expense records. B Y THE COURT: s /M ic h a e l M. Baylson Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O :\C IV IL \0 6 -4 0 0 3 Urban Outfitters v. BCBG Max\Urban Outfitters - Order Remand from Third Circuit.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?