BRAGG v. LINDEN RESEARCH, INC. et al

Filing 30

NOTICE by LINDEN RESEARCH, INC., PHILIP ROSEDALE re 3 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, Certificate of Service. (SOVEN, ANDREW) Modified on 2/5/2007 (np).

Download PDF
BRAGG v. LINDEN RESEARCH, INC. et al Doc. 30 Case 2:06-cv-04925-ER Document 30 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARC BRAGG, Esq., an individual, Plaintiff, v. LINDEN RESEARCH, INC., a corporation, and PHILIP ROSEDALE, an individual, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION Case No. 06-4925 NOTICE OF ERRATA OF DEFENDANTS LINDEN RESEARCH, INC. AND PHILIP ROSEDALE On page 3, line 5 of Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration, Defendants state that Plaintiff Marc Bragg "owns real estate" in California. Defendants withdraw the phrase "owns real estate" and amend their brief to state that Plaintiff "has operated as the General Partner and majority owner of a commercial real estate development project in Northern San Diego County, California .... See http://www.chescolawyers.com/biography.html." Respectfully submitted, /s Andrew J. Soven (/AS 955) Scott D. Baker Andrew J. Soven Andrea B. Weingarten REED SMITH LLP 2500 One Liberty Place Philadelphia, PA 19103-7301 (215)851-8100 Dated: February 2, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-04925-ER Document 30 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Andrew J. Soven, hereby certify that Defendants Linden Research, Inc. and Philip Rosedale's Notice of Errata has been filed electronically this 2nd day of February, 2007, and is available for viewing and downloading from the federal court's Electronic Case Files system. A copy of the foregoing has also been served today by ECF upon the following counsel: Jason A. Archinaco, Esquire White and Williams LLP The Frick Building 437 Grant Street, Suite 1001 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 "s"/ Andrew J. Soven

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?