LANGBORD et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al

Filing 234

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, WE HEREBY ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON COUNT I (FORFEITURE) & COUNT II (DECLARATORY JUDGMENT), ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 8/29/12. 8/29/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROY LANGBORD, et al., Plaintiffs, : : : v. : : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF : THE TREASURY, et al., : Defendants. : _______________________________________: : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Third-Party Plaintiff, : : v. : : TEN 1933 DOUBLE EAGLE GOLD PIECES, : Third-Party Defendant-in-rem. : : _______________________________________: CIVIL ACTION No. 06-5315 JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, we hereby enter JUDGMENT in favor of the United States of America on Count I (forfeiture) and Count II (declaratory judgment). On Count II, we make the following declaration: The disputed Double Eagles were not lawfully removed from the United States Mint and accordingly, as a matter of law, they remain the property of the United States, regardless of (1) the applicability of CAFRA to the disputed Double Eagles, (2) Claimants’ state of mind with respect to the coins, or (3) how the coins came into Claimants’ possession. BY THE COURT: /s/ Legrome D. Davis Legrome D. Davis, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?