LANGBORD et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
Filing
234
ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, WE HEREBY ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON COUNT I (FORFEITURE) & COUNT II (DECLARATORY JUDGMENT), ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 8/29/12. 8/29/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROY LANGBORD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
:
:
:
v.
:
:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
:
THE TREASURY, et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
_______________________________________:
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
Third-Party Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
TEN 1933 DOUBLE EAGLE GOLD PIECES, :
Third-Party Defendant-in-rem.
:
:
_______________________________________:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 06-5315
JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum, we hereby enter JUDGMENT in favor of the United States of America on Count I
(forfeiture) and Count II (declaratory judgment). On Count II, we make the following
declaration:
The disputed Double Eagles were not lawfully removed from the United States
Mint and accordingly, as a matter of law, they remain the property of the United
States, regardless of (1) the applicability of CAFRA to the disputed Double
Eagles, (2) Claimants’ state of mind with respect to the coins, or (3) how the coins
came into Claimants’ possession.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Legrome D. Davis
Legrome D. Davis, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?