CHIRDO v. MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
Filing
99
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE FOR A SPOLIATION CHARGE AND TO EXCLUDE DEFENDANTS' EXHIBITS 10-39, 41 AND 42 AND 61-66 (DOCUMENT #66) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/23/09. 7/23/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lisad, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES CHIRDO, Plaintiff v. MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and, SPECIALTY MINERALS, INC., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION
NO. 06-5523
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2009, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion in limine for a spoliation charge and to exclude defendants' exhibits 10-39, 41, 42 and 61-66 (Document #66), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
