PELZER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 54

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC #38) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/31/09. ) 9/1/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RAYMOND PELZER, Plaintiff v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-38 ORDER STENGEL, J. AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2009, upon consideration of the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Document #38), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. With respect to the Section 1983 claims against Officer Burton, Commissioner Johnson, and the City, the motion is DENIED; 2. With respect to the failure to train claims against Commissioner Johnson and the City of Philadelphia, the motion is DENIED; 3. With respect to the state law claims against Officer Burton, the motion is DENIED; 4. With respect to the state law claims against Commissioner Johnson and the City, the motion is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?