WILLIAMS v. PATRICK et al
Filing
50
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPOUS IS DENIED; AND THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/17/12. 8/17/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JERMAINE WILLIAMS
v.
GEORGE PATRICK, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-776
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2012, upon careful
and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Docket No. 1), and after
review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and the petitioner’s
objections thereto, and after considering a Motion for
Certificate of Appealability (Docket No. 49), IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation are APPROVED and
ADOPTED;
2.
The petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;
3.
The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is
DENIED; and
4.
There is no basis for the issuance of a
certificate of appealability; and the petitioner’s
Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?