JACOBS v. FOLINO
Filing
32
ORDER THAT PETIITONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE MGISTRTE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDASTION ISAPPROVED AND DOPTED; THE PETIITON FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH P REJUDICE; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALBILITY WILL NOT ISSUE; A MEMORANDUM DETAILING THE COURT'S REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RCOMMENDATION WILL FOLLOW; AND THE COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE, STATISTICALLY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/28/11. 4/29/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EUGENE JACOBS
:
v.
:
LOUIS FOLINO, et al.
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 07-925
ORDER
AND NOW, this
28th
day of April, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation are
overruled;
2. The Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted;
3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice;
4. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of any
constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue;
5. A Memorandum detailing the Court’s review of the Report and Recommendation will
follow; and
6. The Court shall CLOSE this case, statistically.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 07-08\07-925 Jacobs v. Folino\Jacobs v. Folino 2254 Habeas Order 07-925..4-28-11wpd.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?