BANKS v. FADDEN et al

Filing 26

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED. ACCORDINGLY, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT SHIVONE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN ON 6/1/09. 6/1/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MAURICE O'NEAL BANKS v. WARDEN MCFADDEN, et al. ORDER : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-967 AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Shivone's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 23) and Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (docket no. 24), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Shivone, and the Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: S/ BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?